October 5, 2022

On Tuesday, Natalie Perkins and Kenneth Hasson (collectively, Plaintiffs) filed a putative class motion towards Zillow Group, Inc. and Microsoft Company (collectively, Defendants) within the Western District of Washington. Plaintiffs allege that Defendants violated the Washington Wiretapping Statute and Washington Widespread Legislation by means of the usage of Session Replay Code on Zillow’s web site. This expertise allegedly permits Microsoft and different unidentified “Session Replay Suppliers” to “… create a video replay of the person’s habits on the web site and supply it to Zillow for evaluation.”

The grievance notes that each Zillow and Microsoft are Washington
firms with their precept place of work within the state. Plaintiffs
are allegedly residents of South Carolina (Perkins) and Pennsylvania (Hasson).

Plaintiffs proposed class is comprised of “All pure individuals in
america and its territories whose Web site Communications had been
captured by means of the usage of Session Replay Code embedded in Zillow’s web site.”

Below the Alternative of Legislation part within the Grievance, Plaintiffs
succinctly summarize the alleged wrongful conduct and the nexus of that conduct
to the State of Washington: “The important thing wrongdoing at situation on this litigation
(Zillow’s procurement of Microsoft and different Session Replay Suppliers to
intercept Zillow’s web site guests’ Web site Communications; Zillow’s
intentional disclosure of the intercepted Web site Communications of its web site
customers; Zillow’s acquisition of the contents of its web site customers’ Web site
Communications with out their consent; and Zillow’s and Microsoft’s violation of
the Washington Wiretap Statute) emanated from Defendant’s respective
headquarters situated in Washington.”

See also  Court docket Dismisses Swimsuit Claiming PTAB’s Construction was Unconstitutional

Plaintiffs allege two causes of motion: “Violation of the
Washington Wiretapping Statute” and a Washington frequent regulation tort, “Invasion of
Privateness – Intrusion Upon Seclusion.” Below the statute as quoted within the
Grievance, “An individual so injured [by a statutory violation] shall be entitled to
precise damages, together with psychological ache and struggling … or liquidated damages
computed on the fee of 100 {dollars} a day for every day of violation,
to not exceed one thousand {dollars}, and an affordable legal professional’s charge and different
prices of litigation.” Below the frequent regulation concept, Plaintiffs allege that
Defendants violated their “goal, cheap expectation of privateness in
their Web site Communications.”

Plaintiffs search declaratory and injunctive aid and “statutory,
precise, compensatory, consequential, punitive and nominal damages,” in addition to
restitution and disgorgement of earnings unlawfully obtained…” together with pre-
and post-judgment curiosity and attorneys’ charges, prices and bills.

The grievance lists 4 corporations as Plaintiffs’ counsel: Tousley Mind Stephens PLLC, Scott+Scott Attorneys At Legislation LLP, Wooden Legislation Agency, LLC, and Lynch Carpenter, LLP